home.pngtwitter-squared.pnglinkedIn.pngmail.pngfacebook.png
TOC.png
TOC.png
Message from the President Keith Toms
Read more >
Message from the Editor
Read more >
Here Comes the Unified Patent Court and Unitary Patent
Read more >
Writing Competition 1st Place: Copyright and Typography: Separating Typography from its Past
Read more >
Writing Competition 2nd Place: Deepfakes are Taking Over Social Media: Can the Law Keep Up?
Read more >
Ornamentality: When Eye-Catching Isn’t Distinctive
Read more >
Deferred Subject Matter Eligibility Response (DSMER) Pilot Program Is Now Open
Read more >
Brazilian Pharmaceutical Patents: The End of ANVISA'S Controversial Prior Consent
Read more >
“What, me worry?” - How Lawyers can successfully navigate the uncertainty of waiting
Read more >
Volunteer as a committee co-chair in 2022
Read more >
List of Officers and Board of Governors and Committees
Read more >
Job Listings
Read more >
< Back
calendar__2_.pngcalendar.png
NEWSLETTER ARCHIVE
Volume 53, Issue 1
BPLA-logo.png
Editor.jpg

Writing Competition 1st Place:
Copyright and Typography: Separating Typography from its Past

By Raji Ayinla, J.D. Candidate, New England Law, Boston
ABSTRACT
This paper will argue for a sui generis copyright protection for typefaces that are designed through a predominately creative process, one that does not overly concern itself with maintaining readability. Part I covers the brief history of typography litigation under the Copyright Act of 1909, addressing the problematic exclusion of typeface protection in the Copyright Act of 1976. Part II introduces the Denicola test as a possible solution, showing how Star Athletica overrules the Denicola test, but still leaves room for an alternative solution. Part III then briefly explores alternative solutions to the copyright conundrum. Lastly, Part IV ultimately proposes that current copyright law is not configured to properly protect typeface designs and as such should follow in Italy’s footsteps by carving out copyright protection for industrial designs.
< Previous Article
Table of Contents
Next Article >
2022 Ⓒ Boston Patent Law Association