Implied In Ink?: How Tattoo Artists Can Claim And Protect Their Copyrights Against An Implied License Defense
Amelia G. Pennington
1 New England Law
Introduction
Tattoos have become an increasingly popular form of art and expression and are now commonly sported by celebrities and professional athletes. As such, the right to copyright a tattoo, an issue that has been identified but never resolved, is ripe for judicial decision. No court has rendered a decision on the merits that expressly states the bounds of copyright enforcement for tattoo art, but, that could change depending on the outcome of the pending case Solid Oak Sketches, LLC v. 2K Games, Inc.
, a case focused on the impermissible reproduction of tattoos in a video game. It is likely, this article argues, that a court will soon grant tattoo artists substantive copyright protections in their original art. It is also likely the court will utilize an implied license defense to balance the rights of the tattoo artist with the rights of the tattoo recipient. Thus, this article explains how tattoo artists should begin to implement daily practices that put themselves in the best position to claim their copyrights, why they should prepare for an implied license defense, and how they can limit the license to non-commercial ventures to maximize their protection and profit.1 B.A., 2015 Allegheny College; J.D. Candidate, 2018, New England Law | Boston. I would like to thank Professor Peter Karol for his insightful comments and encouragement on this article and for always pushing me to produce my best work. I would also like to thank my fiancé Scott Meltzer and my parents for their constant and continued support.
PDF file - 223 KB
READ
Writing Competition
Awarded second place
whose article is entitled