Message from the President Daniel Young
Read more >
Message from the Editor
Read more >
BPLA Comments Regarding USPTO Subject Matter Eligibility Jurisprudence
Read more >
The Smart Healthcare Revolution – What Does it Mean for Patent Attorneys?
Read more >
USPTO Representative Talks TMA at BPLA
Read more >
Pro Bono Spotlight: IP Attorneys Volunteer with New England Innocence Project
Read more >
Request for Comments on the Name of Our Organization and Proposed By-Law Amendment
Read more >
Notice of Nominations for 2021-2022 BPLA Board of Governors
Read more >
Tips for Lawyers & Law Students to Stay Sober During the Holidays
Read more >
Summary of USPTO Update to General Requirements Bulletin and BPLA Response to RFC on Same
Read more >
Announcement of Selection Process for New Committee Cochairs
Read more >
Invented Here! Celebratory event 2021
Read more >
Retirement of Judge Bowler and Opening for Appointment of New Magistrate Judge
Read more >
Market Exclusivity for Pharmaceutical Products in Europe
Read more >
List of Officers and Board of Governors and Committees
Read more >
Job Listings
Read more >
< Back
NEWSLETTER ARCHIVE
Volume 52, Issue 4
undefined
Summary of USPTO Update to General Requirements Bulletin and BPLA Response to RFC on Same
Jonathan B. Roses, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
Following a virtual April 2021 Brown Bag Lunch hosted by the BPLA’s Patent Office Practice Committee on the USPTO’s proposed changes to the General Requirements Bulletin (which detail the requirements applicants must satisfy in order to sit for the patent bar exam), the BPLA submitted a Response to the USPTO’s Request for Comments.  In its Response, the BPLA agreed with the USPTO’s proposed addition of certain degrees to the “Category A” of specified bachelor’s degrees that presumptively qualify for acceptance, the proposal to add master’s and doctoral degrees to Category A, and relaxing coursework requirements for certain Category B applicants.  In addition, the Response recommended the addition of additional specified degrees to Category A, as well as a flexible approach to interpreting whether a degree whose title did not explicitly match the title of a Category A degree should nonetheless qualify to avoid the need for applicants to resort to qualification under Category B.  The Response also explained that such a “common sense” approach could serve the goal of increasing inclusivity in the patent system, as numerous sociologic and institutional barriers already complicate engagement with our intellectual property systems, and additional burdens, even if incremental, could serve to substantially deter ultimate admission for individuals presently underrepresented in the innovation ecosystem. On September 22, 2021, the USPTO issued a Notice on Administrative Updates to the GRB that implemented changes consistent with those proposed by the BPLA.  In addition to implementing the proposed revisions to the Category A list of degrees and relaxing coursework requirements for Category B, the USPTO added an additional degree, environmental engineering, to Category A, as was proposed by the BPLA.
< Previous Article
Table of Contents
Next Article >
2021 Ⓒ Boston Patent Law Association